Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Current »


The desired outcomes for the meeting are:

  1. We have an understanding of partners’ progress on implementation

  2. Questions about adoption, modification for fit, and technical issues are discussed and next steps are identified

  3. CDC Technical Monitors have an understanding of how CDS tools can be implemented in health centers

Tentative Agenda:

  1. Welcome

  2. Partner Updates

  3. HealthFlow integration of PrEP and PEP

  4. Data Summary

  5. Discussion and questions, next steps

  6. Close out

Attendees

AllianceChicago

OCHIN

CDC

NACHC INFORMATICS

HealthFlow

athenahealth

  • Andrew Hamilton
  • Shelly Sital
  • JR Segovia
  • Jena Wallader Gemkow
  • Nicole Padula
  • Michael Lieberman
  • Seren Karasu
  • Karen Hoover
  • Aileen Ya-Lin
  • Dejene Parrish
  • Patrick Schoen (HRSA)
  • Mary Tanner
  • Anne Kimball
  • Weiming Zhu
  • Kevin Delaney
  • Pamela Gruduah
  • Ninad Mishra
  • Julia Skapik
  • Pedro Carneiro
  • Andrea Price
  • Jayson Osik
  • Ken Allgood
  • Thai Lam
  • James

  • Nele Jessel
  • Chad Dodd

Vincenzo Ferraro

Patankar Minal

Agenda/Notes

Topic

Speaker

Notes

Action Items

11am

Welcome

Julia

*Is it ok if we record this for Union CHC in Bronx?

Monthly Implementation Slides Summary

Julia/Andrea

https://nachc.atlassian.net/l/cp/NMnRpMH0

AllianceChicago

  1. Status of site agreements

  2. Review of Implementation Plan

    1. Site readiness for automation

    2. Barriers and opportunities

    3. User/Success stories

AllianceChicago

Aileen -

  • (I did not catch the first question)

  • Baseline data should be collected prior to tool implementation? One of the sites had the tool since July; the second site needed a different start date to make it prior to implementation because they started later.

OCHIN

  1. Sites

  2. Review of Implementation Plan

    1. Site readiness for automation

    2. Barriers and opportunities

    3. User/Success stories

OCHIN

Implementation by the end of the month.

Baseline data is already in.

Admin

Athena

Partners Union and TrueHealth - Ken

  • How can we use athenahealth without disrupting the care cycle.

  • Mapping has been done to athena model, now working to get ..

  • Next steps push data to Athena for … requests…

  • Working to push data to Athena regardless of user

HealthFlow integration of PrEP and PEP

HealthFlow

Ken - Supporting additional testing

Looking at how to include PEP and PrEP in the decision model, cannot be picked up and dropped in.

Ken and Julia will be at HL7 meeting in May, and will discuss - is this an area for connect-a-thon testing, or an example for future HL7 meetings, such as in Sept - can we work with other EHR partners to implement the tool?

We reached out to eCW, they had a customer interested in using the tools, are talking with that customer as well.

The workflow that is associated with this in integrated wtih HealthFlow’s work with another party to drive the standards forward and get adoption of the standard approaches.

Aileen - is PEP and PrEP already implemented in OCHIN and Alliance?

A: There are parts of it, yes, kind of at OCHIN

A: This is not already part of the specification.

Next agenda - update on HL7 call.

Reminder about Harvest Meeting

Friday July 14

Questions and Discussion

CDC, All


Close Out

Julia

  • No labels