Date
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
|
Attendees
NACHC Informatics Team | AllianceChicago | OCHIN | CMQCC | Redwood Community Health Coalition |
---|---|---|---|---|
Roxane Padilla Ta-Yun Yang Lisa Masinter Jena Wallander Gemkow | Seren Karasu AnnMarie Overholser Michelle Whitt | Leslie Kowalewski Elliott Main |
Discussion items
Person | Topic | Action Items | |
---|---|---|---|
Julia | Review of Measures DocumentDocument
Finalizing Measures for Year 4 | Ta-Yun could send a document or summary describing concepts / codes / data elements / C-CDA document types that describes or informs the pregnancy status | |
We are actually interested in the lab values in the postpartum period – the expectation is that the GDM diagnosis will be captured to identify patients but if there is another method that captures a significant amount of patients (OGTT is positive without GDM diagnosis code—then please use this method and let us know)
It is only relevant to determine the window of the postpartum screening
Either approach is fine provided there is an evidence-based or validated cutoff or set of cutoffs—if you are providing positive/negative or none/mild/moderate/severe kinds of categories a mapping would be very helpful in case we get raw data from others and can validate the normalization approach
Please remove the duplicate
Lab values indicating proteinuria or low platelets are relevant—otherwise they are not needed
This is not a formal measure for year 4 – we are just looking at data completeness and form/manner as an investigatory query
| |||
Bundled Payments | |||
Questions | Are there contraception policies at Catholic hospitals in your network that affect the CHCs? | ||
Admin | Contracting Redwood - Arlene Harvest Meeting AllianceChicago Billing question - Jena |