Versions Compared

Old Version 10

changes.mady.by.user Andrea Price (Deactivated)

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Andrea Price (Deactivated)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.



#Date identifiedRisk

Probability

(1-9)

Impact

(1-9)

Score

(PxI)

Mitigation PlansClosed/OpenRisk Owner
1
Partners will not be able to map all the elements to the Data Dictionary, or won't have an equivalent field in their EHR, and the quality of the data submitted for baseline will not be useful until work-arounds are found.9872
Closed
2
AllianceChicago not providing data and ending the year with no activity6954
  1. Bugging them
Closed
3
CDS tool not delivered on time7963
  1. Ask for updates on a regular basis
Closed
4
Partners cannot use CDS because it is too difficult to integrate


  1. During the design meeting, we include a session with the technical ppl from each site who can tell us what their protocols are for integrating the CDS into their system
Closed
5
CDC believes this is a 3-year project with 1-year funding.  9981How do we make this right with our vendors and partners?Closed
61/17/2023Neither partner, AllianceChicago nor OCHIN, are implementing the CDS tool - AC because they are integrating it into their EMR, OCHIN because they say they are required to have a provider or care team member sign off. They have not considered the paradigm shift of addressing the issue as a systems issue within the organization to normalize HIV testing.  CDC is now fully aware that neither partner is implementing the way they thought, and therefore cannot use this as a proof of concept for other things.9981
  1. We continue to run the project as it is because these are the realities of practice and continue to explain to CDC that this IS in fact the proof of concept - that there needs to be change management and systems analysis before plonking a CDS tool into a clinic.
OpenAndrea