Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


The desired outcomes for the meeting are:

  1. We have an understanding of partners’ progress on implementation

  2. Questions about adoption, modification for fit, and technical issues are discussed and next steps are identified

  3. CDC Technical Monitors have an understanding of how CDS tools can be implemented in health centers

Tentative Agenda:

  1. Welcome

  2. Updates from Partners

  3. Discussion and questions, next steps

  4. Close out

Attendees

AllianceChicago

OCHIN

CDC

NACHC INFORMATICS

HealthFlow

athenahealth

  •  Andrew Hamilton
  •  Shelly Sital
  •  JR Segovia
  •  Jena Wallader Gemkow
  •  Nicole Padula
  •  Michael Lieberman
  •  Seren Karasu
  •  Karen Hoover
  •  Aileen Ya-Lin
  •  Dejene Parrish
  •  Patrick Schoen (HRSA)
  •  Mary Tanner
  •  Anne Kimball
  •  Weiming Zhu
  •  Kevin Delaney
  •  Pamela Gruduah
  •  Ninad Mishra
  •  Julia Skapik
  •  Pedro Carneiro
  •  Andrea Price
  •  Ken Allgood
  •  Thai Lam
  •  James

  •  Nele Jessel
  •  Chad Dodd

Initial feedback on data

Review of Partner Implementation Status

Date:

Slides: 2023-02-10 HIV and IEW Y2 All Partners Meeting Slides.pptx

Can we delete the requirement for the slides as it is being substituted by implementation plan? Julia - No just for March.

  •  Andrea will delete the requirement to send slides for March

Topic

Person

Action Items

Admin - Meetings

NACHC would like to separate these two meetings instead of combined. Can IEW project partners make a 2pm meeting on the 2nd Monday of the month for all partners call?

Julia

IEW 1st Mondays

  • 1pm or 2pm

March only? March 3rd or 4th Monday for March

  • Afternoon

  • Tuesday or Wed afternoon after 11am

  • Please provide feedback; NACHC will provide a few choices

HIV -

  • Keep it at this time?

  • Provide choices for March to Julia

OCHIN Seren - Mondays aren't great for OCHIN, we have some standing meetings already

OCHIN AnnMarie 2pm on Mondays is not good for

[11:08 AM] Shelly Sital - Same for Alliance -- the 3rd Monday is a no-go for sure. Could do the 4th Monday at 3pm EST

HIV

  •  Andrea - meeting agenda for Next meeting
  • Partner Updates

  • HealthFlow integration of PrEP and PEP

  • Data Summary

Review of Partner Implementation Status

Discussion of technical issues of implementation

  •  Andrea to paste template on Confluence page

  •  Andrea Ask Julia what dates need to be in HCN - 2/15?

  •  Andrea to paste template on Confluence page

Karen - Do we need OMB Clearance for questions? If more than 10 respondents, then it needs to be cleared by the OMB.

Aileen - DUA process for data?

Yes, DUAs are in process or completed. Waiting on one DUA for the data from Year 1 partner.

Confluence glitch - information is dropping out of

Julia - We will move next scheduled meeting to Friday 3rd or 4th week in March is ok, then we will send out invite.

3rd week would be better, Seren will be OOO 3/24. Looks like WHPP meeting is the 3rd week. If Mike is ok to join 3/24 without me then that would be fine

Partners - New sites are just coming on board - partners have not had a chance to talk about the project much yet.

Julia - Do a rapid test rather than a lab test.

Ken - Healthflow can create workflows that include a human intervention, and each site can decide what they want. This could increase

Karen - Not a great idea to move to rapid tests, whereas lab reporting is what gets reported to CDC. Encourages us to have the health systems get the results to the labs, who can send to CDC.

Julia - In her health center EHR, the results go into the lab section. When there is a positive result, the person gets sent to get a lab test.

Karen - Unless it is an alear antigen antibody test. Instant tests are not specific enough for early detection. This would be taking the CDC vision to implement automatic testing, CDC is trying to assess a health delivery model, and intended that this model is implemented and tested. If NACHC partners implement another model, there will not be a good test of this model. The project turns into a service delivery project, not a model.

Shannon - The rapid test does go into a structured field. There is a distinction between rapid and lab result. (did not get all this - about lab result LOINC codes.

Health centers want to be adherent and find that rapid testing is a good entry point, a way to engage the person further - esp if they are not sure that the patient will return to get the lab test. If it comes back positive (or negative), it gives an opportunity to open the conversatsion.

Karen - Negative results as well, as CDC has adopted a Status Neutral model.

Rapid point-of-care antibody screening tests are sometimes performed for convenience and/or cost. An initial positive rapid antibody test is only preliminary. In this setting, a laboratory-based combination antigen/antibody assay should be performed if the rapid test is positive.

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/23447

Julia explained that street teams and outreach teams use rapid tests.

Karen - Acknowledged that rapid tests are used in outreach; the project goal was to get lab orders.

Julia - Clinic hours are until 7pm and some patients are unhoused - the lab closes at 4pm, so a rapid test gives the opportunity to start the intervention.

Partners can discuss implementations with their sites.

Karen - Would be helpful to know which sites implement which routes so we can monitor the outcomes for each workflow.

Julia - We could then see the patterns of opt-out and outcomes. This is part of the Implementation Plans we are asking partners to complete.

Karen - The Opt Out option was to be part of the tool, intended to be for the patients, not the providers.

  •  Andrea will send the partner template to Julia/Pedro to revise for the next All Partner meeting.

March NACHC’s Policy and Issues forum - we have a session on EHE - White House Director, HRSA Director, a Health Center - NACHC web site has schedule. This session is Thursday morning. Policy & Issues Forum - NACHC

  •  Send slides from the P&I session to the CDC Technical Monitors

IEW

  •  Andrea check off there IS an EOP for IEW.

  •  Andrea will change the dates on the HCN contract and resubmit to Julia.
  •  When are the Implementation Plans due? Before the next All Partners call.
  •  How should the Implementation Plan be submitted? Ray: Put it on Confluence so you can change it. But if you want to do it in a word document, NACHC will paste it into Confluence page, and NACHC will put it in a SharePoint document and share that out.

Discussion of technical issues of implementation

  •  Meeting agenda for next meeting
  • Data approaches

  • Making it easier to implement at the Front Desk

  • Ability to get data for improved granularity


Agenda/Notes

Topic

Speaker

Notes

Action Items

11am

Welcome

Julia

11am

All Partners

  1. Administrative

  2. Review of deliverables on SOW

  3. Updates (will also be covered in the next two sections)

All

We reviewed SOW, Task 1 is almost complete, need data upload to NACHC.

  •  Andrea mark off OCHIN SOW tasks complete.

AllianceChicago

  1. Status of site agreements

  2. Review of Implementation Plan

    1. Site readiness for automation

    2. Barriers and opportunities

    3. User/Success stories

AllianceChicago

12:45 - 13:00

OCHIN

  1. Sites

  2. Review of Implementation Plan

    1. Site readiness for automation

    2. Barriers and opportunities

    3. User/Success stories

OCHIN


13:10 -

13:30

Questions and Discussion

CDC, All

13:30

Close Out

Julia

Monthly Progress Slides

(not required in March)

AllianceChicago

OCHIN

Image Added

Image Added