| | | |
---|
9/12/24 | Check In Call | Foundational Paper Eboni wrote Discussion & Limitations sections, Joy currently reviewing (separate document, will send to team after meeting) Jen added data limitations References currently as comments, Ray can work on it or Pedro will complete it when back In methods - don’t need to say how many partners engaged, clearer in results
Vaccine Hesitancy Haven’t done any analysis yet MPH paper focused on big push, mentioned list of narratives; not worried Previously identified themes? Deductive using identified themes? Inductive, grounded theory to verify & compare themes found from AI? Hybrid approach - traditional thematic analysis and include additional themes from AI analysis?
| |
8/24/24 | Check In | | Eboni will take a look at Discussion section and add suggestions, write draft with Joy @Pedro Carneiro (Deactivated) will lead paper submission
|
7/25 | | Foundational Paper Intro, Methodology (could use minor additions) Stuck on Results, came up with outline Discussion -
Vaccine Hesitancy Next meeting
| @Sarah Price to fill in details on why partners dropped Eboni will work with Joy and work on Discussion section ATSU team will work on journal selection recommendations
|
6/27 Vaccine Hesitancy | | Emory Student Thesis No conflict Did not include tables, people won’t be able to find her thesis likely Can cite her thesis Different methodology to analyzing data, can compare Include and emphasize co design of sessions
Ray’s Analysis Amazon Bedrock - foundation is the transcripts Titan - can ask questions about themes and it cites which text transcripts documents it is pulling examples from Separate into organization, conduct analysis on each group → put into table Not trying to replace grounded theory, only supplement it RAG - prevent large language models from hallucinating
Next steps
| |
5/15 Vaccine Hesitancy & Foundational | | SharePoint issues, will resend link to ATSU team and may need to contact IT Vaccine Hesitancy Foundational Paper Final Meeting scheduling:
| |
5/13/24 Internal Meeting | | How do we want to present the activities? @Pedro Carneiro (Deactivated) aiming to have draft of methods by 5/15 meeting PHIT working on partner mapping, resources on
| |
4/26/24 Foundational Paper | Methodology & Results | | |
3/28/24 Foundational Paper | Review Intro & Methodology | Sarah sent CDC Project Determination to Joy We can receive no-cost extension through December, still would like to have done by July Methods May want to limit scope, so that we can limit results How was the learning community developed? Reached out to HCCNs, PCAs, how many people wanted to be part of it, how were they chosen, what did it mean to be part of the learning community, etc. Appendix with each year’s interventions Addition of Informatics team after first two years of project How a national organization can partner with the CDC and health centers to help support the safety net
Results section plan: How can we bring people in to support that effort? Results from the learning community Informatics data quality lens? Qualitative Surveys, feedback from participants, even attendance - what is the value added, why did they stick around, etc.
Joy out the week of the 8th and 15th
| Project Determination sent says pending, Sarah will send official letter Pedro & PHIT to discuss methods, will help inform results Week of April 22nd, NACHC to send over progress for ATSU to react to
|
3/7/24 Vaccine Hesitancy | | | Spreadsheet of data on vaccine hesitancy survey from Clinovations @Sarah Price will write summary of Messaging Matters methodology IRB - Sarah will send CDC project determination
|
2/22/24 Foundational Paper | Review updated outline Discuss data (Pedro) Potential journals Next steps, roles & responsibilities
| | NACHC will internally discuss and propose additional opportunities for papers PHIT will send follow up email with manuscript list, other resources
|
2/1/24 - PHIT, Clinovations, Informatics, ATSU Vaccine Hesitancy | Brief Intros Review and discussion of content shared last month (in this folder: Vaccine Hesitancy Paper) Discussion around current work on Declinations and how that might fit in Next steps: Outline Additional data/content sources Roles/Responsibilities
| Vaccine hesitancy interviews - 19 HCs, 90 minute interviews, 4 sessions of 60-90 minutes (1 facilitated discussion with staff, 1 with patients; reconvened for feedback) Survey that gets into what staff felt were the greatest challenges and strategies when it comes to addressing patient hesitancy 2 papers - patient & providers?
| Sarah to start write up of Messaging Matters work PHIT & Clinovations to discuss general outline, sending responses to ATSU Pedro can take first pass and share a table Sarah can send project determination materials to Joy to submit to IRB
|
1/25/24 - PHIT, Clinovations, Informatics, ATSU Foundational Paper | Updates? Feedback on materials Roles & responsibilities Next steps, future meeting schedule
| Goal today: Check in on documents, create plan of attack Outline of Foundations Paper Adult Immunizations today Standards of immunization Here’s are the interventions offered to health centers, what they chose to focus on Here’s some data (not strong data to show improvement of rates, talk about the quality of the data?) What we learned from project, future policy implications
What do we want from this paper? Telling the story of the project, vaccinations and quality improvement Look at intersectional groups' vaccination rates Bigger story that HCs take care of the most vulnerable, we gave them options of what to do, how they implemented Include data anecdotally, trends Pneumo interventions more effective in Y5, flu & COVID hit by vaccine hesitancy Health centers got to pick interventions, show which ones picked what and what we know what they did over the project years and can talk about individual interventions in later papers? Winding Waters & PneumoRecs app intervention Holyoke outreach to Spanish speaking patients and making phone calls Shingrix could be its own paper later, what happens when policy changes Overarching theme - foundational principles of standards of adult immunization
Where can we submit this? Previous vaccination paper submitted to Journal of Public Health Management & Practice Just published with MH in Journal of Healthcare Quality, solid journal and straightforward process BMC Public Health Springer, International Health? May be easier to decide once we have written in
| |
12/15/23 – PHIT, Clinovations, Informatics, ATSU | Agenda | | Work on grouping/categorizing intervention table, add reflections/quotes Will send another doodle poll for availability
|
11/30/23 - PHIT, Clinovations, Informatics, ATSU | Introductions Data and Intervention Review Roles/Responsibilities Next Steps
| Gaps in the data: Denominator: number of health centers involved (Y5 has larger denominator but lower rate. Look at flu data at a jurisdiction level? Need to look at 63% jurisdiction (NW/NE, etc..) missing. Success - not looking at overall populations but target population rates and the interventions Next meeting - will split time to discuss foundational & vaccine hesitancy papers | Clinovations to add to interventions table TBD Sarah to send upload NACHC to share documents, SharePoint folder (update with data, interventions, final reports)
|
11/13/23 - PHIT, Informatics, ATSU | Introductions –2 min Review of Manuscript List: Publications: 5 min Discussion –led by Joy Lewis: 20 min Establish next steps: 18 min File sharing—new Sharepoint link/folders: Publications Roles/Responsibilities Timeline (via Asana)
| Foundational paper and Vaccine Hesitancy can be written concurrently and highest interest Form workgroups We have IRB, would just need to submit to ATSU to get it signed off
| Next meeting right after Thanksgiving, want to get started before winter break - set up Doodle poll |
11/2/23 - Internal + Clinovations | | Joy “We are in, we are pumped, looking forward to the meeting!” Clinovations proposal for work for this year:
Gaps found by Clinovations? See section 6 IIS - broader policy landscape at play regardless of responses from partners Group - Data quality, validation and population health
Policy lens - Lack of clarity around hard recommendations and soft recommendations - evidence and guidance layer Policy - ability to ensure all the infrastructure gets built - state infrastructures of various quality and nothing that connects them and compels public health to be consistent Access & supply chain Connectivity and services between public health and HIE’s, tracking vaccines, who has what, doing the dashboard, getting patients in, vaccine hesitancy
Vaccine hesitancy Was there an intervention done? AC/HCN did motivational interviewing intervention Matches up with Messaging Matters work done before Haven’t explored much in the data, but we may have some on patient reason for decline and could match with provider (Jen’s idea)
Dashboard & population health management What is real data vs. UDS data?
| Clinovations will send updated workplan proposal, NACHC team will react to |
10/19/23 - Internal | Discussion Points: Reflections Slide deck data pitch Next Steps Data
| | Need to answer the question - what data is working? Slide deck data pitch Next meeting with Jim McRay at team Meeting with Joy soon PHIT will set up work session Pedro will do some background research
|
10/12/23 - Internal | | Last meeting was positive but overwhelming Two data angles: Workplan has 3 publications New models of care - pharmacist Policy - what do the policy people want to know? Depending on the journal, can divvy up authorship, writing Literature review
| |
10/10/23 - ATSU | Purpose: To develop a strategy to publish the Immunization Data from year 5 and 6 of the Adult Immunization work Welcome and Introductions (3 minutes) Adult Immunization Overview (5 minutes) 5 years in the making… Data Overview Jen (5 minutes) the what the where the mess Clinovations Findings (3 m) Publication Strategy 30 minutes QI Data Qualitative feedback COVID? SDOH?
Next Steps
| Able to collect information on health center patients who got vaccines elsewhere? Historical vaccine information is recorded, likely incomplete 3 buckets of data - infrastructure (Informatics, what’s in the EMR), sample selection, implementation 60+ hours of qualitative data on distrust of healthcare system, interventions to minimize (Messaging Matters, Emory has transcripts? Recordings on Zoom/Confluence)
Lack of ability to communicate scientific information to the public - what we knew and what level we knew it Data can illustrate what we can do better “If I understood what you meant, would my face look like this” book
SDOH - data is limited, haven’t done much analysis - best is housing and still <50% Initial ideas Advocate for national system of adult immunization (similar to VFC) Compare by state and presence/absence of adult immunization system and % of patients that got vaccinated Ability of states to who have data or not Qualitative - asking facilitators HC data where they are the only provider in their county?
Data is in the hands of patients If there were to be a national vaccine program instituted next year, would health centers be ready? No, many operational factors, policy factors
We have CDC IRB/Project Determination
| |
Clinovations - Potential Publication Topics Utilizing the Standards to Reshape Vaccine Programs Audience: Clinical leadership, health center administrators Focus: Experience and benefits of utilizing pharmacists to expand access to adult immunizations
Leveraging Health Center Staff to Expand Access Audience: Pharmacy, Primary Care Focus: Experience and benefits of utilizing pharmacists to expand access to adult immunizations
Assessment of the Standards for Adult Immunization Practice Audience: Clinical leadership, health center administrators, national policy Focus: Reflection that the Standards address “internal” factors that health centers can control, however, there are “external” factors (e.g., workforce and scope of work policy; reimbursement levels; availability and quality of external data) that impact the success of adult immunization programs
Future topics to consider, based on how Year 6 work unfolds with opportunities to incorporate publication plans into the partnerships and assessment tools and/or surveys |
10/5/23 - Internal | Goal: To design the data strategy for Adult Immunizations Current state: Jen Data Elements needed: Sarah Data Analyses and Visualization: Jen and Pedro Manuscripts
| Focusing this year on publishing We have final report from Clinovations as springboard Working with Joy who will provide support Kathy received gaps in literature from CDC Policy lens? Position policy paper?
Should aim to have a quantitative and qualitative; mixed-methods paper later on ATSU can do some of the analysis and validation of quantitative data Also looking at revisiting white paper on adult immunization policy Could reference quality measures - collaboration between vaccines and pregnancy? Infectious disease - flu, COVID, & RSV all forecasted to be moderate, worry of zip codes where these are converging Needed: data strategy for Y6
AMY (CDC) Top Requests: Manuscripts Data, Data, Data Microlearnings for Adult Immunization Implementation (Package for CHCS) Bundle services (Hypertension, Pregnant women, OUD, SUD etc) Policy Paper to share lessons learned (ONC, Hill) Toolkits for scane and spread ( CEOS, PCAs, HCCNs, teams, Board) Follow-up with NACCHO to align the work
| NACHC team: Define what is the story Areas of focus: Primary authors: Sarah and Jen People/processes/technology/policy lens Data strategy for Y6: Jen to design what data we should focus on for subpopulations For Joy meeting on Tuesday, 10/10: Jen to run through the data context, Sarah to run through qualitative |