Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 6
Next »
| Notes | Action Items |
---|
4/9/24 - CCQ “Global RFP Process Development” Meeting | “Competitive Procurement Approach” Intended Outcome: Standardized and Centralized NACHC RFP Process that is timely, efficient, and advances NACHC as partner of choice Goal: Put ourselves in a position to do our contracts as soon as possible in the new contract cycle and have as much of the project year as possible General competitive procurement approach to identify vendors. It's not to identify vendors for specific projects at this juncture. Hope to expand this process to NACHC-wide Will do more specific applications as projects become more concrete
Outcome is a “preferred vendor list” but may want more diplomatic language Separate from Cobblestone process Open competition is the core procurement process - sole source only if necessary Work Groups: Asana/Project Management - Andrea P & LeeAnn Marketing - Comms (Ellen) Survey/Qualtrics - Caryn, Meg, Andrea A, Tristan? Rubrics/Review/Identifying Reviewers/Processing Responses - Sarah, Emily, Pam
Important questions: Who is responsible and accountable for keeping this list up to date and how often? Are vendors able to update rates/information due to external factors of influence (e.g., economy, inflation). Furthermore, is this an open, continuous process or will we consider an enrollment/opening period on a recurring basis? Will we consider this binding?
| |
| | |
0 Comments