Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Reverted from v. 6
Panel
panelIconIdatlassian-info
panelIcon:info:
panelIconText:info:
bgColor#DEEBFF

Instructions: Use the pencil icon in the top right to edit the form below. ↗️ Remember to push PUBLISH when you are done to save your work.

...

Stain Statin Initiation Goals: PENDING CONFIRMATION

Important Health Center Context

Fill out this section during your planning process

Internal Characteristics

What are the characteristics of your health center? (rural/urban; other demographic variables, use of expanded care team, culture)?  

  • Urban location

  • Demographics:

    • 76% non-Hispanic, 23% Hispanic

    • 65% black/African American, 31% white

  • Use of expanded care team: Primary Care and specialties such as nutrition, BH, Dental, Peds, OBGYN

  • Culture: mostly afro-Caribbean/black African American

How do interventions and/or workflows need to be adapted to ensure health equity?

  • Bridge to Wellness: program to address SDOH primarily transportation and food insecurity

  • Participate in MH, TargetBP to address chronic disease conditions

  • Patient care navigators (pre-visit planning, care gaps)

  • Integrated BH team

  • HCT team to address HIV diagnosed pts and HIV prevention

  • Utilization of telehealth to deliver services

  • Managed care department to review care gaps for HEDIS measures

  • QI department reviews UDS performance and takes action monthly (PDSAs)

How complex are the patient interventions to implement (e.g., perceived difficulty of implementation, reflected by duration, scope, radicalness, disruptiveness, and number of steps required)?

  • Complexities are centered around time and other resources:

    • demand on provider time to address & implement

    • availability of support staff and other resources to operationalize interventions and evaluate outcomes

What are key characteristics of the participating setting(s)?

  • Strong and engaged Clinical Director of Medical Services

  • Ongoing training and competency evaluation of clinical support staff

  • Open forum via Breakfast Club twice monthly to address provider & clinical support staff learning needs

  • Support of PCN team for pre-visit planning

  • Clinical decision support in Epic EHR (Care Gaps)

External Characteristics

What external or environmental supports or threats are there?

  • Supports:

    • availability of grant funding for primary health care

    • strong community partnerships

    • strong partnerships with professional organizations (ex: AHA)

  • Threats:

    • funding (Medicaid expansion in FL was declined)

    • Medicaid Redetermination impacts the patient demographic we serve

    • National data reports that most FQHC patients only come for one visit and then switch orgs (BCOM finds this too)

Plan

Actual

Describe Intervention

Chosen intervention:

Plan for intervention:

Ongoing provider education on cholesterol guidelines & strategies to overcome patient hesitancy (motivational interviewing), fine tuning the way we share information and improvement efforts with providers (newsletter).

Each meeting a topic is selected - an issue is the amount of time to explore any topic - each month run providers list of patients who should be on statin therapy and sort by outcome (those not on statin and should be are at top of list.

Chosen Intervention:

Date when implemented:

Updates:

Reach (#/% patients – or providers, for provider-facing interventions – who participated in intervention)

Reach of implementers/providers?

Planned:

By the end of the project period, 100% of PCPs will participate in Ongoing provider education on cholesterol guidelines & strategies to overcome patient hesitancy (motivational interviewing)

Reach of implementers/providers?

Actual:

Reach of patients?

By the end of the project period, 75% of patients who are considered at high-risk of cardiovascular events will be receive education using clinical references.

Reach of patients?

Actual:

Efficacy (Impact of intervention on important outcomes)

How will you measure that your intervention is working?

Documentation of provider attendance via sign-in sheets or other administrative records.

Were you able to accurately measure how your intervention was working?

What outcomes do you expect?

By the end of the project period, 85% of patients who are considered at high-risk of cardiovascular events will be prescribed a statin.

What outcomes have you seen?

How will you ensure your intervention will be effective for your target population?

Did your intervention reach the target population?

What unintended consequences or outcomes might there be?

What unintended outcomes did you experience?

Adoption (#/% and representativeness of staff and sites who implemented the intervention)

How did clinicians respond to interventions to intensify medication more rapidly/address therapeutic inertia?

Who will deliver the intervention (actually do the work)? Include staff and sites, if applicable.

Who delivered the intervention? Did they have the skills and time needed to complete the intervention?

How will you know if clinicians/care teams/sites used the intervention?

What proportion of the planned staff/sites implemented the intervention?

Were there any differences between care teams/sites who adopted the intervention best vs. others who did not (e.g., differences in staff types, capacity, etc.)?

Implementation Fidelity (How closely the staff/sites followed the intervention design, delivered it as intended – also called fidelity to the intervention)

How will you know what adaptations or modifications were made during the intervention?

How did you track modifications during the intervention?

What might be some of the possible obstacles to consistent implementation?

What were the barriers to consistent intervention implementation?

What costs and resources (including time and burden, not just money) need to be considered?

What costs and resources (including time and burden, not just money) need to be considered?

How closely did the staff/sites follow the intervention design and deliver as intended?

Check all that apply:

  •  Followed as designed
  •  Followed with minor modifications
  •  Followed somewhat as designed
  •  Not followed as design
  •  Delivered consistently/as intended
  •  Delivered somewhat consistently/somewhat as intended
  •  Delivered inconsistently/not as intended

Modifications made and other notes:

Maintenance (Extent to which intervention is part of routine practices and protocols)

What reinforcements will you put in place to sustain the intervention, if effective?

  •  Protocols
  •  Clinical decision support (alerts, order sets, templates, registries)
  •  Policies
  •  Regular training
  •  Regular reports
  •  Incentives
  •  Other:

Explain:

What reinforcements did you put into place to sustain the intervention?

  •  Protocols
  •  Clinical decision support (alerts, order sets, templates, registries)
  •  Policies
  •  Regular training
  •  Regular reports
  •  Incentives
  •  Other:

Explain:

How will you spread your intervention and lessons learned?

How will you spread your intervention and lessons learned?

What are likely modifications or adaptations that will need to be made to sustain the intervention over time (e.g., lower cost, different staff, reduced intensity, different settings)?

Intervention #2

Plan

Intervention #2

Actual

Describe Intervention

Chosen intervention:

Plan for intervention:

Lists generated. Providers review list and f/u with patients.) Might add staff to add with measures - now that can look at care gaps and quality measures - that extra person could help the providers. In UDS system - BCOM small and Portia is in UDS.) Some inertia. Still recognize the provider heart health champion - this is motivating providers to look at all heart health measures - riding on interest that created this summer)

Wave in Epic - also happening at network level

could do a in person or virtual visit

Chosen Intervention:

Date when implemented:

Updates:

Reach (#/% patients – or providers, for provider-facing interventions – who participated in intervention)

Reach of implementers/providers?

Planned:

Reach of implementers/providers?

Actual:

Reach of patients?

Reach of patients?

Actual:

Efficacy (Impact of intervention on important outcomes)

How will you measure that your intervention is working?

Were you able to accurately measure how your intervention was working?

What outcomes do you expect?

What outcomes have you seen?

How will you ensure your intervention will be effective for your target population?

Did your intervention reach the target population?

What unintended consequences or outcomes might there be?

What unintended outcomes did you experience?

Adoption (#/% and representativeness of staff and sites who implemented the intervention)

How did clinicians respond to interventions to intensify medication more rapidly/address therapeutic inertia?

Who will deliver the intervention (actually do the work)? Include staff and sites, if applicable.

Who delivered the intervention? Did they have the skills and time needed to complete the intervention?

How will you know if clinicians/care teams/sites used the intervention?

What proportion of the planned staff/sites implemented the intervention?

Were there any differences between care teams/sites who adopted the intervention best vs. others who did not (e.g., differences in staff types, capacity, etc.)?

Implementation Fidelity (How closely the staff/sites followed the intervention design, delivered it as intended – also called fidelity to the intervention)

How will you know what adaptations or modifications were made during the intervention?

How did you track modifications during the intervention?

What might be some of the possible obstacles to consistent implementation?

What were the barriers to consistent intervention implementation?

What costs and resources (including time and burden, not just money) need to be considered?

What costs and resources (including time and burden, not just money) need to be considered?

How closely did the staff/sites follow the intervention design and deliver as intended?

Check all that apply:

  •  Followed as designed
  •  Followed with minor modifications
  •  Followed somewhat as designed
  •  Not followed as design
  •  Delivered consistently/as intended
  •  Delivered somewhat consistently/somewhat as intended
  •  Delivered inconsistently/not as intended

Modifications made and other notes:

Maintenance (Extent to which intervention is part of routine practices and protocols)

What reinforcements will you put in place to sustain the intervention, if effective?

  •  Protocols
  •  Clinical decision support (alerts, order sets, templates, registries)
  •  Policies
  •  Regular training
  •  Regular reports
  •  Incentives
  •  Other:

Explain:

What reinforcements did you put into place to sustain the intervention?

  •  Protocols
  •  Clinical decision support (alerts, order sets, templates, registries)
  •  Policies
  •  Regular training
  •  Regular reports
  •  Incentives
  •  Other:

Explain:

How will you spread your intervention and lessons learned?

How will you spread your intervention and lessons learned?

What are likely modifications or adaptations that will need to be made to sustain the intervention over time (e.g., lower cost, different staff, reduced intensity, different settings)?

...