Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

This page houses the data governance policies and procedures developed by the NACHC Clinical Affairs team in partnership with other NACHC teams and external partners. These policies and procedures can be applied to activities where data is involved but are primarily focused on data sharing that is defined as 1) NACHC receiving data from an external organization,  or 2) NACHC sharing data with an external organization.  Shared data may be aggregated at the health center level, patient level, or event level (e.g., a lab result). 

...

NACHC uses data either shared with NACHC by another organization or collected by NACHC. When NACHC has received data from an outside organization, NACHC acts as a data steward. Data stewardship is the collection of practices that ensure an organization’s data is accessible, usable, safe, and trusted. 

Data Shared with NACHC

There are many types of data that may be shared with NACHC including UDS data, clinical data, and financial membership or other health center data.

UDS Data

NACHC receives UDS data from HRSA that includes health-center level information on a variety of topics including services, staff, capacity, and financial data so that NACHC can perform analyses on behalf of HRSA and FQHCs to describe the health center landscape and services. The UDS data that NACHC receives includes some data that is available publicly and some sensitive data that only NACHC holds. UDS data does not contain PHI but is sensitive. Sharing UDS data with NACHC occurs under a cooperative agreement with HRSA which is overseen by the Director of Knowledge Management and Learning (Currently Margaret Davis). The parameters of UDS data sharing and use are defined in two HRSA agreements (Authorization letter, NACHC DUA). Included in these documents are explicit directions about how findings from the UDS data should be communicated in a way that protects the identity of health centers and their patients. 

...

Identified data sets which include PHI beyond that which would qualify as an LDS and are not accepted by NACHC at this time. 

Financial Data

...

Membership and Other Health Center Data

...

For some projects, NACHC collects its own data, usually in the form of surveys that are completed by health centers or member information. These surveys will be anonymous and do not collect patient identifiers if received or held directly by NACHC. Need to expand this. Talk to Meg.

Requests for Data 

NACHC receives requests for data that are either apart of a new or existing project.

NACHC uses a central request process where requests are received, reviewed by the GC, approved/denied, and then delegated to the appropriate project lead. Requests can be submitted here. Request submission requires a detailed description of what data is desired, how the data will be used, the type of use (e.g., research, surveillance, quality improvement or other) and how the request aligns with the NACHC vision. Incomplete requests cannot be evaluated and will be returned to the requester.

Requests for data are evaluated by the GC. Requesters will be notified ​of an approval or denial within one week of the GC meeting. ​

For requests of data that NACHC has received for other projects, NACHC cannot approve the request without approval from the originating data partner and the GC.
Sometimes data requests are soliciting a data sharing partnership such as one organization hoping to partner and share data with a health center through support from NACHC.  NACHC is facilitator of information partnerships​ rather than a broker of data​. NACHC strongly prefers building an information partnership with the goal of collaboratively developing a data sharing project that is beneficial to all parties involved.  

...

Federal regulations require that research projects involving human subjects be reviewed by an Institutional Review Board (IRB). According to the FDA, an IRB is an appropriately constituted group that has been formally designated to review and monitor biomedical research involving human subjects. The IRB must approve or determine the project to be exempt or approved prior to the start of any research activities. The IRB cannot provide approval or determinations for research that has already been concluded.

...

The federal regulations define both "research" and "human subject." Research is defined as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.Studies must be reviewed by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) only if both definitions apply.  A project may involve data from human subjects, but not meet the definition of research and would, therefore, not require an IRB review. Research is defined by federal regulations at 45 CFR 46.102 (Protection of Human Subjects 2009), as "a systematic investigation including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge."

...